Shitty (CGT) question.

Today I had my second and last mid semester. It was on Principles of Taxation Law, better known just as Tax Law.

And as per usual papers, I didn't finish it. I normally don't finish because of two reasons:
1. Not enough time
2. Not enough knowledge

And this, as it's an open book exam, I can't claim deduction for the second criteria, therefore I will make do with the first, although it's partially due to the second criteria that the first criteria happened.

Well anyway, I fumbled through the shitty question, and gave a shitty answer, and should be awarded with a shitty mark. Bleh.

Anyway, that's about all I will comment on my exams.

I'm not one to discuss the "How did it go?" question. Cause, however it went, wouldn't really matter. If it was good, great. If it wasn't, you're surrendering yourself to endless torture for the entire period till the results get back, and you either (a) proved yourself right that you did badly or (b) proved your friends who said you were wrong, wrong.

So where's the good in that? MC>MB => should not make the choice. See, my Microeconomics 1 is proving very useful in my daily life, and blogging. =P